http://www.ssbits.com/home/ http://www.ssbits.com/blog/2011/january-site-of-the-month/#PageComment_323 Hey Aram, fair decision on the voting I think because personally I'm voting for the site with the most innovative use of SilverStripe. Now that I have voted I'd like to still see the description and author for each of the sites though. RSSName http://www.ssbits.com/blog/2011/january-site-of-the-month/#PageComment_323 http://www.ssbits.com/blog/2011/january-site-of-the-month/#PageComment_315 Aram, We ran a few media blitzes (twitter,etc.) encouraging users of the Paulick Report site to vote. We were all very excited about this I am surprised at the decision to remove votes from those who had not already been registered. Is the idea to grow the SilverStripe community and increase exposure? RSSName http://www.ssbits.com/blog/2011/january-site-of-the-month/#PageComment_315 http://www.ssbits.com/blog/2011/january-site-of-the-month/#PageComment_313 RULE CHANGE - I have now changed the rules to avoid vote skewing. In order to vote you must have signed up before the voting started. I have removed all of the votes from members who signed up after and in future members who sign up after voting begins will not be allowed to vote. This has been prompted by what appears to be severe gaming, which is not in the spirit of the vote; this is a community competition, not a 'see how many people I can get to sign up and vote for me competition'. If anyone disagrees with this decision please feel free to comment below. Aram RSSName http://www.ssbits.com/blog/2011/january-site-of-the-month/#PageComment_313